PolityGovernance
News 4 of 27

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Clinically Administered Nutrition, Directs Centre to Frame Passive Euthanasia Law

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
11 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Year 2018Year 2024Year 2026
Bodies:Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtMedical Boards
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of Clinically Administered Nutrition (CAN) for Harish Rana, a 31-year-old in a vegetative state.

2.The verdict overrules the 2024 Delhi HC and SC view that feeding tubes are not medical interventions.

3.The Court has directed the Centre to frame legislation on passive euthanasia to address procedural complexities and prevent abuse.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has permitted the withdrawal of Clinically Administered Nutrition (CAN) for a patient in a vegetative state, exercising its 2018 passive euthanasia guidelines. This landmark decision overrules previous jurisprudence and explicitly directs the central government to frame comprehensive legislation to govern the process and prevent potential misuse.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Landmark Case (2018)Common Cause v Union of India
Key Concept Introduced (2018)Living Wills
Previous CaseAruna Shanbaug v Union of India
Critical Body for EvaluationMedical Boards

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Landmark Case (2018): Common Cause v Union of India
  • ›Key Concept Introduced (2018): Living Wills
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The 2018 case 'Common Cause v Union of India' which first allowed passive euthanasia.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The role of 'Medical Boards' in evaluating requests for passive euthanasia.
  • ›Target this Concept: 'Living Wills' or Advance Medical Directives.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article forms the basis for the Supreme Court's judgments on the right to a dignified death, including passive euthanasia?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding passive euthanasia in India:

1. The Supreme Court first allowed passive euthanasia in the Aruna Shanbaug case.

2. The concept of 'Living Wills' was introduced by the Supreme Court in its 2018 Common Cause judgment.

3. The withdrawal of Clinically Administered Nutrition (CAN) is now considered a permissible act under the passive euthanasia framework.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

In which year did the Supreme Court deliver the landmark 'Common Cause v Union of India' judgment that first recognized the legality of passive euthanasia in India?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary rationale cited by the Supreme Court for directing the Centre to frame legislation on passive euthanasia after its latest verdict?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on CAPF Act 2026 Challenged for Violating Articles 14, 16, 21

The Supreme Court has questioned the constitutional validity of the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Act, 2026, which mandates IPS officer deputation to senior CAPF posts, potentially overriding a 2025 SC judgment. This case tests the separation of powers and the rights of CAPF cadre officers under Articles 14, 16, and 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs RBI, States, CBI on Digital Arrest Scams: SOP, Kill Switch, ₹18 Cr Restored

The Supreme Court issued interim directions to combat digital arrest scams, including RBI SOP for banks, operationalization of grievance redressal and money restoration modules, and examination of a 'kill switch' for calls. The court noted a decline in reported fraud but stressed continued vigilance. This is crucial for understanding judicial activism in cybercrime and institutional coordination.

Environment Current Affairs

Supreme Court Allows Narrow Post-Facto Environment Clearance Amnesty, Sets Aside 2021 OM

The Supreme Court struck down the 2021 Office Memorandum that allowed blanket regularisation of projects without prior environmental clearance. However, it permitted a narrowly tailored amnesty scheme if justified by compelling public interest, shifting from its earlier absolute ban. This judgment reinforces the precautionary principle and proportionality, requiring the government to demonstrate necessity and weigh environmental costs.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Stays HC Order Declaring NSEI as 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act Section 2(h)

The Supreme Court has stayed a Delhi High Court order that declared the National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI) a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. This means citizens cannot currently enforce their right to information from NSEI. The case challenges whether a stock exchange, though controlled by the government, should be treated as a public authority.