11 March 2026, Questions & Answers

Explanation

As per the article, the Supreme Court asked 'AIIMS Delhi' to admit the patient to its palliative care department for supervised withdrawal of treatment. This is a specific institution mentioned in the news content.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states this is the 'first application' of the passive euthanasia framework from the Common Cause case. Statement 2 is incorrect because the framework requires assessment by two boards: a Primary and a Secondary Medical Board. Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions the bench waived the 30-day period noting that 'all the stakeholders were unanimous'.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that Harish Rana 'has been in a persistent vegetative state for over 13 years after suffering head injuries from a fall in 2013.' The other options are close but incorrect distractors.

Explanation

The article explains that the distinction for passive euthanasia 'flows from Article 21, which the Supreme Court has interpreted the "right to life" to include the right to live with dignity.' This forms the legal bedrock for allowing the withdrawal of futile medical intervention.

Explanation

The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions is the nodal agency for policies related to civil services, recruitment, and reservation guidelines, including the issuance of relevant Office Memorandums.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the SC emphasized considering the 'status' and 'category of post'. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Court dismissed the Centre's appeals and did not uphold the 2004 letter; it found the letter created discrimination. Statement 3 is correct as the Court explicitly called this differential treatment 'hostile discrimination'.

Explanation

The article clearly states that the dispute centered around the 'September 8, 1993 Office Memorandum (OM) issued by the Government of India'. October 14, 2004, is the date of the subsequent clarificatory letter, and March 11, 2026, is the news publication date.

Explanation

The judgment explicitly states that creating artificial distinctions between equals 'would amount to equals being treated unequally, thereby attracting the rigour of the equality doctrine under Articles 14, 15 and 16'. This is the core constitutional principle applied to prevent hostile discrimination.

Explanation

The judgment explicitly references Article 41 (public assistance in cases of sickness) and Article 47 (duty to improve public health) from the Directive Principles of State Policy to underline the state's constitutional obligation. Articles 21 and 32 relate to life/personal liberty and remedies for enforcing rights, which were not the core cited basis here.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The Court directed that the existing AEFI monitoring mechanism continue and data be placed in the public domain, referencing its May 2, 2022 order. Statement 2 is incorrect: The Court explicitly stated it does NOT proceed on the premise that the regulatory approval process was unlawful or deficient. Statement 3 is correct: The bench rejected the prayer for a separate court-appointed expert body in view of existing scientific assessment mechanisms.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: 'Overall, nine cases of alleged vaccine-related deaths were raised in the various petitions before the SC.' The other numbers are plausible distractors but not mentioned in the text.

Explanation

The core of a 'no-fault' compensation policy, as directed by the SC, is to provide relief without requiring affected families to undergo the onerous legal burden of proving negligence or liability (fault). This is distinct from automatically paying for any event (option C) or assigning criminal liability (option D).

Explanation

In the landmark Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) case, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the 'Right to Die with Dignity' is an integral part of the 'Right to Life' under Article 21.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The Aruna Shanbaug case (2011) was the first judicial recognition of passive euthanasia. Statement 2 is correct: The Common Cause case (2018) constitutionally anchored the right and introduced the 'Living Will' framework. Statement 3 is incorrect: The 2023 modifications simplified the process by introducing timelines and limiting the magistrate's role, but they did not remove the requirement for approval from Primary and Secondary Medical Boards.

Explanation

According to the article, Harish Rana suffered severe head injuries due to a fall in Chandigarh in August 2013 and has been in a Persistent Vegetative State since then.

Explanation

As explained by advocate Rashmi Nandakumar in the article, the Court clarified that District CMOs must empanel doctors so that Secondary Medical Boards can be constituted promptly. This aims to make the established medical-board process workable, ensuring that families are not compelled to seek judicial intervention in every case, unless there is a disagreement between medical boards.

Explanation

Article 324(5) of the Constitution explicitly states that the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court. This high threshold ensures the independence of the Election Commission.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the MoPNG order mentioned in the article. Statement 2 is the correct geographical description of the Strait of Hormuz. Statement 3 is incorrect because the article states that the 60-day deadline and easing of curbs apply to specified sectors like capital goods, while restrictions are retained for strategic sectors like semiconductors.

Explanation

The article states that the Union Cabinet approved an additional allocation of Rs 1.51 lakh crore for the Jal Jeevan Mission till 2028. ₹2.08 lakh crore was the earlier allocation in 2019, and ₹3.59 lakh crore is the total central outlay including the new allocation.

Explanation

The Supreme Court, while hearing a plea on discriminatory Muslim personal law provisions, stated that a UCC is the 'most effective answer' to usher in equality in inheritance laws. The Court added that striking down personal law provisions would create an 'unnecessary void', making it prudent to defer to the legislature to implement Article 44.

Explanation

The Supreme Court, in its judgments on euthanasia including the 2018 landmark ruling, has interpreted the 'Right to Life and Personal Liberty' under Article 21 to include the right to die with dignity under specific, safeguarded circumstances.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect. The court explicitly stated the family's decision was NOT an 'act of surrender' but one of 'profound compassion and courage'. Statement 2 is correct as the article mentions the plea cited the 2018 five-judge bench ruling. Statement 3 is incorrect; the court clearly said "This decision is not about choosing death" but about not artificially prolonging life.

Explanation

The article states that Harish Rana suffered severe head injuries in August 2013 and had been in a vegetative state for the last 13 years at the time of the Supreme Court hearing in 2026.

Explanation

The Supreme Court's reasoning, as quoted in the article, clarifies that the decision is "one of not artificially prolonging life. It is the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment when that treatment no longer heals, restores or meaningfully improves life." This is the defining principle of passive euthanasia as opposed to active intervention.

Explanation

As per the article, the IndiaAI Mission is implemented by 'IndiaAI', an independent business division under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). This ministry handles policies related to IT, electronics, and internet governance.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the subsidized rate under the Compute Pillar is ₹65 per hour, not ₹100. Statement 3 is correct as 'IndiaAI FutureSkills' aims to build AI-skilled professionals from undergraduates to PhD students.

Explanation

The article explicitly states India's 'longer-term target of 2 lakh GPUs to stay competitive with the world’s AI leaders.' The other options are plausible but incorrect figures not mentioned in the context of the long-term target.

Explanation

The article defines sovereign AI as the capacity to create AI using a nation's own resources, which would ensure that its 'governance, defence, and economic models are fully under its own jurisdiction.' This is presented as a strategic hedge against dependency and a global 'compute divide.' The other options are not the core rationale presented.

Explanation

The article states the report was tabled by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). CAG is the supreme audit institution of India under Article 148. NGT is an environmental court, CPCB is a pollution control body, and NMCG is the implementing agency.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect because the audit found most STPs did NOT comply with NGT norms. Statement 3 is incorrect as the audit found District Ganga Committees did NOT prepare any district-level river basin management plans.

Explanation

The article states that during joint inspection of 37 STPs, 12 were discharging untreated sewage. This constitutes approximately 32% (12/37). 21% is a distractor referring to the number of symbolic STPs (21), and 34% refers to physical progress under natural landscape.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: "A major reason for coliform bacteria to increase in a river is the release of untreated sewage." While other options are potential sources of pollution, the audit specifically identifies untreated sewage discharge as the key factor for the coliform spike.

Explanation

The article explicitly states the Siliguri Corridor is a 'strategically vital strip of land in West Bengal'. This is a key geographical fact for mapping and security-related questions.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; 72% of villages are opposite northeastern states, with 90% of those opposite Arunachal Pradesh, not Ladakh. Statement 3 is incorrect; the dimensions are 22 km wide and 60 km long, not the reverse.

Explanation

The article specifies that 'almost 90% are opposite the state of Arunachal Pradesh.' The 72% figure refers to villages opposite all northeastern states. This distinction is a classic data-based trap.

Explanation

Lt. Gen. Ghai explicitly states these are 'dual-use assets that reduce logistics vulnerability and enhance our ability to induct forces, fortifying the Siliguri Corridor.' While they aid development, their primary strategic objective in this context is security-related.

Explanation

The article states that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued draft amendment directions on February 11, 2026, for 'Advertising, Marketing and Sales of Financial Products and Services by Regulated Entities'. RBI is the primary regulator for commercial banks in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The article states PSBs earned 'almost Rs 30,000 crore' (the exact figure is ₹28,647 crore). Statement 2 is correct: SBI accounted for 59% of the commissions, which is more than half. Statement 3 is incorrect: The RBI's draft guidelines are proposed to come into effect from April 1, 2026, not 2025.

Explanation

The article provides the year-wise breakdown: ₹3,728 crore (FY21), ₹4,734 crore (FY22), ₹5,944 crore (FY23), ₹6,528 crore (FY24), and ₹7,714 crore in FY25. The other options are commission amounts from earlier years.

Explanation

The article quotes the Minister of State for Finance stating that the RBI's draft directions contain instructions to ensure that banks' policies and practices 'neither create incentives for mis-selling nor encourage employees to push the sale of products.' The other options contradict the article's context, which is about curbing, not promoting, such sales.

Explanation

The article clearly states that Major-General Kaiser Rashid Chowdhury is the Director-General of Bangladesh's top defense intelligence agency, the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI).

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; he met Parag Jain (chief of RAW) and Lt Gen R S Raman (Director-General of Military Intelligence), not IB and DIA chiefs. Statement 3 is directly mentioned in the article. Hence, both 1 and 3 are correct.

Explanation

The article states that the two accused, Rahul and Alamgir Hossain, were apprehended from Bongaon in West Bengal's North 24 Parganas district by the state's Special Task Force (STF).

Explanation

The article's core focus is on the security dimension. It states that detailed discussions were held on intelligence-sharing and security partnership, as India is keen to partner with the new government to counter anti-India activities. This was the primary objective of the visit.

Explanation

The Supreme Court specifically directed AIIMS, Delhi to admit the patient to its palliative care department to carry out the withdrawal of treatment. This is a factual point from the article.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states this is a 'first-of-its-kind ruling'. Statement 2 is correct as the court waived the 30-day period. Statement 3 is incorrect; the Delhi High Court had earlier dismissed the plea precisely because the patient was NOT on mechanical life support, a fact mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article clearly states the patient suffered injuries in August 2013 and the ruling was in March 2026, which amounts to approximately 13 years. This is a direct data point from the news.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the 2023 modification by a five-judge bench was to make the withdrawal process 'less stringent and more workable', with changes including 'introducing timelines for each board to make its decision and limiting the role of the judicial magistrate'. This tests understanding of the evolution of the legal framework.

Explanation

NCERT is an autonomous organization that assists and advises the Government of India, specifically the Ministry of Education (formerly the Ministry of Human Resource Development), on policies for school education.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect: The Court directed the chapter to be incorporated in the 2026-27 academic session, not 2025-26. Statement 2 is correct: The Court asked the Centre to constitute a committee preferably including one former senior judge. Statement 3 is incorrect: The Court specifically stated its directions are NOT intended to prevent objective and legitimate criticism.

Explanation

The article explicitly states the chapter was in the NCERT Class 8 textbook. This is a direct factual recall from the news content.

Explanation

The Court stated it saw 'no reason' why such persons should be associated with curriculum appraisal for children, indicating the content about the judiciary was the core issue. The procedural lapse of not placing it before the full NSTC was noted by NCERT but was not the Court's primary stated reason for the blacklisting order.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions the 'full bench of the EC' comprising CEC Gyanesh Kumar and Deputy Election Commissioners reviewing preparedness. The Election Commission is the constitutional body under Article 324 responsible for conducting elections.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the CEC announced 100% webcasting. Statement 2 is correct as the final list was published on February 28 per the Act. Statement 3 is incorrect; the CEC stated that cases were referred to judicial officers and did not confirm completion before polls.

Explanation

The article states that West Bengal would see 100% webcasting across all its 'approximately 80,000 polling stations'. The other options are close but incorrect distractors.

Explanation

The CEC explicitly stated that judicial officers are 'taking decisions on the eligibility of electors in line with Article 326'. This article is the constitutional anchor for determining who is eligible to vote as an adult citizen.

Explanation

The Supreme Court has interpreted the 'right to life and personal liberty' under Article 21 to include the 'right to die with dignity'. This forms the constitutional basis for permitting passive euthanasia in specific cases.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states the patient has been in a vegetative state for 13 years. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article references the Aruna Shanbaug case, not Gian Kaur. Statement 3 is incorrect as the article explicitly states palliative care at AIIMS will not hasten death but allow a natural end.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that Harish Rana, a Ghaziabad resident, has been in a persistent vegetative state for 13 years. All other options are close but incorrect distractors.

Explanation

The article quotes Dr. Sushma Bhatnagar stating, "We will not prolong death and we will not hasten death." This is the defining principle of the palliative care approach in this context, distinct from active euthanasia or aggressive life support.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the Sudha Gopalakrishnan Brain Centre (SGBC) is located at IIT Madras. While Kris Gopalakrishnan also supports a Centre for Brain Research at IISc Bengaluru, the SGBC project discussed is specifically at IIT Madras.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article mentions the plan is to create cellular-level brain maps 'of people across ages, population groups, ethnicities, and disease conditions.' Statement 2 is incorrect because the article clarifies the project is 'a unique case of a philanthropy-led initiative,' with the bulk of funding from private sources (Pratiksha Trust) and only seed money from the government. Statement 3 is correct as the article states the centre released its first dataset of 'three-dimensional digital reconstructions of five foetal brains' in 2024.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: 'Gopalakrishnan has so far pumped in about Rs 800 crore into various ventures in Indian science, primarily into brain research at IISc, IIT Madras and a few other institutions.' The Rs 30 crore figure refers to the government seed funding, not Gopalakrishnan's total investment.

Explanation

The article quotes Gopalakrishnan's two reasons: 'Improved understanding of brains is what has led to recent breakthroughs in computing... I was convinced that newer and better models of computing would come up if we understood the brain even better. At the same time, I wanted to support something that was socially relevant... More and more people would be affected by age-related disorders such as dementia, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.' This combines the goals of advancing computing and addressing social health issues.

Explanation

The article clearly states that for slums located on land owned by the Delhi government, the nodal agency is the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB), which comes under the Urban Development Department. DDA is nodal for central government lands.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states the current policy prioritizes in-situ rehabilitation within a 5 km radius. Statement 2 is correct as it mentions the payment range for a 25 sq m house. Statement 3 is incorrect because the proposed extension is for the cut-off date of the 'dwelling unit' (to Jan 1, 2025), not for the 'slum existence' (which remains pre-Jan 1, 2006).

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that only two in-situ projects have been completed over the past decade: in Ashok Vihar and Kalkaji, with a total capacity of around 4,700 flats.

Explanation

The article states the key revision is 'to make all slum dwellers in the national capital eligible for permanent housing' by extending the cut-off date. This expansion of eligibility is the core objective, as opposed to the other options which are either not mentioned or are incidental effects.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that RIL owns and operates the world's largest single-location refining complex in Gujarat's Jamnagar. This is a key static GK fact about India's industrial infrastructure.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The article states this is the first new refinery in the US in five decades, with the last major one built in 1976. Statement 2 is incorrect: The $300 billion figure represents the estimated value of crude processed and products produced over 20 years, not a direct investment. Statement 3 is correct: The article quotes America First Refining stating the refinery is 'specifically engineered to process American light shale oil'.

Explanation

The article clearly states: 'The last major refinery built in the United States was the Marathon Refinery, built way back in 1976, when oil cost under $5 a barrel.' This is a precise data point for factual recall.

Explanation

The article quotes analyst Shanaka Perera stating that the Iran war proved America's dependence on foreign refining capacity for products from its own shale. Building domestic capacity is a structural defense against supply chain chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. The other options are not supported as primary reasons in the text.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that the PIL was heard by a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. The Supreme Court is the apex court and has original jurisdiction to entertain PILs for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article, which quotes the RPwD Act's schedule. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states Section 124 of the BNS penalizes causing hurt by 'throwing acid on or by administering acid' equally. Statement 3 is correct, as the petition argues the exclusion is 'manifestly arbitrary' violating Article 14 (equality before law).

Explanation

The article provides data showing 198 cases pending in Uttar Pradesh, which is higher than West Bengal (160), Gujarat (114), Bihar (68), and Maharashtra (58). This is a direct factual recall question testing attention to numerical data presented in judicial proceedings.

Explanation

The article clearly states the petition argues the exclusion 'violates Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law, and Article 21, which provides the right to life and dignity.' Article 14 prohibits arbitrary classification, and Article 21's expansive interpretation includes the right to live with dignity and access rehabilitation.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the court held a GUI can be considered for registration under the Designs Act. The case involved interpreting Sections 2(a) and 2(d) of this specific Act.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the court's observation quoted in the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article mentions the WIPO survey found 92% protection, not 'over 95%'. Statement 3 is incorrect; the article mentions the Hague Agreement and the Riyadh Design Law Treaty, not TRIPS or the Paris Convention.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: 'A recent survey conducted by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has found that 92 per cent of jurisdictions already protect GUIs under design laws.' The other options are close but incorrect distractors.

Explanation

The article states the controller's office argued that GUIs lack 'permanence' because they are visible only when powered on and do not constitute a 'finished article' capable of being sold separately. The court found this contention legally untenable.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the 'Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026' was issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG). This ministry is the nodal body for regulation of petroleum and natural gas in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The ECA was enacted in 1955. Statement 2 is incorrect: The 2020 amendment did not impose blanket controls; it deregulated food items, allowing stock limits only under extraordinary circumstances like war or famine. Statement 3 is correct: As per the article, the 2020 amendment delisted food items including cereals, pulses, and edible oils.

Explanation

The article states: 'Over 50% of these imports are sourced from West Asian countries like Qatar and the UAE.' This highlights India's significant energy import dependency on a geopolitically volatile region.

Explanation

The article makes it clear the order was issued because fuel shipments via the Strait of Hormuz were halted due to war, creating a supply crisis. The objective was to divert gas to 'priority sectors' like households (PNG), transport (CNG), and LPG production to mitigate the impact of this disruption.

Explanation

The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG) formulates policies and manages programs related to exploration, production, refining, and import of petroleum products, including the Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) program.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the US issued a temporary 30-day waiver, not a permanent one, specifically for crude already on tankers. Statement 3 is correct as mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article states: 'Around 130 million barrels of Russian crude was estimated to be on ships on water as of early March.' This stockpile was key for India to redirect supplies amidst the crisis.

Explanation

The article explains that experts see the waiver 'as part of Donald Trump’s effort to prevent a further and sustained spike in international oil prices—and the consequent rise in domestic fuel prices in the US—given the midterm elections later this year.'

Explanation

The article explicitly refers to CEEW as a 'climate think tank'. Think tanks are research organizations that conduct analysis and advocacy on specific policy areas, unlike statutory regulators (e.g., CPCB), intergovernmental panels (e.g., IPCC), or UN agencies (e.g., UNDP).

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article's first paragraph. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states that 70% of districts saw an increase in warm nights, while only 28% saw an increase in hot days, making nights the more widespread trend. Statement 3 is correct, as mentioned by CEEW's Disha Agrawal regarding scaling up to 600 GW to meet demand reliably.

Explanation

Dr. Vishwas Chitale is quoted stating that extreme heat poses a risk to 57 per cent of Indian districts, which are home to 76 per cent of the population. The other options swap these percentages as distractors.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that experts emphasize the importance of using granular data and including measures for night-time heat and humidity stress in HAPs. The other options are either extreme, not mentioned, or contradict the article's focus on localized, inclusive planning.

Explanation

As per the article, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) granted the Noida International Airport a provisional aerodrome licence on March 6. DGCA is the statutory body responsible for regulating civil aviation and issuing such licences in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as mentioned in the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states that the process for constructing the second *runway* (not terminal) will begin after crossing 1 crore passengers. Statement 3 is correct as per the project's final planned scale.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that once the entire project is completed, the airport is expected to handle up to 300 million (30 crore) passengers annually. Option A is the Phase 1 capacity, and option B is the capacity with two runways.

Explanation

The article directly mentions that the project is expected to ease congestion at Delhi's IGI Airport and aims to bring economic and industrial growth to the region by boosting logistics, tourism, and trade. The other options are either incorrect or not the primary objective as stated.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the Faridabad-Jewar Greenfield Expressway is being developed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). NHAI is the nodal agency for national highway development in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the project is an elevated corridor (not at-grade) and it will intersect key corridors like the Eastern Peripheral Expressway, Yamuna Expressway, and Dedicated Freight Corridor. Statement 3 is correct as explicitly mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article clearly states the Union Cabinet approved the project at a cost of ₹3,631 crore. ₹2,414 crore is the cost mentioned for the Faridabad-Jewar Greenfield Expressway approved earlier under Bharatmala, which is a different but integrated project.

Explanation

The article quotes industry observers stating that major infrastructure developments could support property value growth of 35-50% in the coming years. The other options are not supported by the article's content.

Explanation

Section 138 is a specific provision under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which governs promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. It is not part of the general criminal law in the IPC or CrPC, nor the contract law.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the court's ruling created an exception where the presumption can be rebutted if dishonour is due to an external account freeze, not insufficiency of funds. Statement 3 is correct as the judgment specifically linked liability to the drawer's control over the account at the time of presentation.

Explanation

The article states the order was dated March 4. The publication date is March 11, 2026, and the cheque was issued in 2024, confirming the ruling year as 2026. March 9, 2024, is the cheque issue date, and March 11 is the article publication date.

Explanation

The core legal reasoning, as per the article, was that the cheque was dishonoured due to a 'debit freeze' ordered by police, which was an external factor beyond the drawer's control at the time of presentation. The court held this negated the criminal liability under Section 138. Reimbursement and RERA settlement were additional facts but not the primary legal ground for quashing.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that the clarification was provided by officials from the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), which is responsible for FDI policy and promotion.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect because entities registered in LBCs still require prior government approval. Statement 2 is correct as the article states the definition is in line with money laundering rules. Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions a 60-day expeditious approval for select sectors.

Explanation

The article clearly states: 'Investors with non-controlling LBC Beneficial Ownership of up to 10% shall be permitted under the automatic route.' The other options are common FDI caps used as distractors.

Explanation

The article explains that the amendment addresses concerns raised by funds like BlackRock and Carlyle, which were forced to seek government approval even with negligible Chinese shareholding. The new threshold aims to facilitate such investments while maintaining strategic guardrails.